• Thu. Nov 12th, 2026

Two Sudbury Police Officers and Third Man Charged with Obstruction of Justice Following Fatal 2025 Carbon Monoxide Incident

Two sworn members of the Greater Sudbury Police Service (GSPS) and a third individual are facing criminal charges of obstruction of justice stemming from an extensive provincial police investigation into the 2025 carbon monoxide death of a 19-year-old man in Lively, Ontario.

The charges, announced by the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), mark a significant and troubling development in a complex multi-year case that has intersected tragic loss of life, allegations of criminal negligence, and accusations of off-duty police misconduct.

The legal proceedings center around Sgt. Jason Bonish and Const. Alex Balloway of the Greater Sudbury Police Service, alongside an unidentified third man. According to law enforcement authorities, both officers were off duty at the time of the alleged conduct that led to the charges. The specific allegations against the officers and the third individual have not been proven in court, and all accused individuals maintain the presumption of innocence throughout the judicial process.

The origin of the case dates back to May 23, 2025, when emergency responders were called to a residential address in the community of Lively, located within the city limits of Greater Sudbury. Upon arrival, emergency personnel discovered 19-year-old Roch Renaud unresponsive inside the home. Despite emergency medical interventions, Renaud could not be revived and was pronounced dead at the scene.

Subsequent medical and forensic examinations officially confirmed that the young man’s death was caused by carbon monoxide poisoning. Carbon monoxide, a colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas, is a dangerous toxic agent that can accumulate in enclosed residential spaces due to malfunctioning appliances, improper ventilation, or faulty heating systems. The sudden death of the 19-year-old sent shockwaves through the local community, prompting an immediate investigation into the physical and environmental circumstances surrounding the fatal exposure.

Two Sudbury officers charged with obstruction after man’s carbon monoxide death

In the initial aftermath of the discovery, officers from the Greater Sudbury Police Service initiated standard investigative procedures to determine how the lethal concentration of carbon monoxide had built up within the residence and whether any criminal acts, omissions, or regulatory violations contributed to the outcome. However, within weeks of opening the file, senior leadership within the GSPS identified a critical administrative hurdle.

In June 2025, the Greater Sudbury Police Service formally determined that an institutional conflict of interest existed regarding its involvement in the investigation. Under established legal and professional guidelines in Ontario, municipal police services are required to recuse themselves from active investigations when an internal, personal, or structural conflict arises that could compromise, or appear to compromise, the impartiality and objectivity of the inquiry.

To preserve the absolute integrity of the process and ensure public confidence in the findings, the Greater Sudbury Police Service requested that the Ontario Provincial Police assume full control of the investigation. The OPP, serving as an independent external law enforcement agency, accepted the mandate and launched a comprehensive, top-to-bottom probe into both the root cause of the toxic gas exposure and all conduct associated with the events surrounding the incident.

For over a year, detectives with the OPP conducted detailed forensic reviews, witness interviews, and procedural examinations. The investigation reached a major milestone on October 8, 2026, when provincial police formally laid serious criminal charges related directly to the fatality. The OPP charged two individuals and one corporate entity with criminal negligence causing death under the Criminal Code of Canada.

Under Canadian criminal jurisprudence, a charge of criminal negligence causing death requires prosecutors to demonstrate that an accused party showed wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons, resulting in fatal consequences. The inclusion of a corporate body alongside individual defendants underscored the complex scope of the inquiry, pointing toward potential issues regarding property management, equipment maintenance, or institutional safety duties at the location where the tragedy occurred.

The case took another dramatic turn with the recent announcement that OPP investigators had expanded the scope of criminal accountability to include allegations of procedural interference. Following further investigative work, the OPP arrested and charged Sgt. Jason Bonish, Const. Alex Balloway, and a third civilian man with obstruction of justice.

Two Sudbury officers charged with obstruction after man’s carbon monoxide death

In the Canadian legal system, obstruction of justice is a serious criminal offense defined under Section 139 of the Criminal Code. It encompasses any deliberate attempt to obstruct, pervert, or defeat the course of justice, whether through the willful tampering of evidence, misleading investigators, intimidating witnesses, or attempting to improperly influence an ongoing legal process. While the OPP has not publicly disclosed the precise acts that gave rise to the charges against the two officers and the third individual, the charges indicate that investigators believe deliberate efforts were made to interfere with the lawful examination of the fatal carbon monoxide incident.

The revelation that active police officers face criminal charges linked to a fatal investigation has drawn significant public attention across northern Ontario, prompting the Greater Sudbury Police Service to issue an official statement addressing the matter and reassuring the local community.

In its public communication, the Greater Sudbury Police Service addressed the direct impact these charges have on community relations, recognizing the gravity of the allegations against its personnel.

“The Greater Sudbury Police Service recognizes the concerns these allegations raise within our community and the importance of maintaining public trust and confidence,” the police service stated.

The statement went on to draw a clear distinction between the alleged off-duty actions of the individual officers and the broader day-to-day operations of the police force, emphasizing that the charges should not reflect on the dedication of the service as a whole.

“While this matter involves allegations concerning off-duty conduct, it does not diminish the dedication, professionalism, and integrity demonstrated each day by the members of the Greater Sudbury Police Service who serve our community with pride,” the statement continued. “We remain committed to the highest standards of professionalism, accountability, and respect, both on- and off-duty.”

Two Sudbury officers charged with obstruction after man’s carbon monoxide death

The position of off-duty police officers occupies a unique place in Canadian law. While off-duty officers are not actively executing shift duties, sworn members of police services remain subject to strict codes of conduct, institutional ethics, and the overarching governing frameworks set out by provincial policing legislation. When off-duty actions cross into alleged criminal conduct, particularly conduct that affects an active investigation into a civilian death, it triggers both criminal proceedings in the justice system and potential internal administrative reviews regarding professional suitability and employment status.

The Greater Sudbury Police Service reiterated that the external investigation led by the Ontario Provincial Police remains active and ongoing. Investigators continue to gather information regarding the timeline of events leading up to Roch Renaud’s death in May 2025, as well as any actions taken in the weeks and months that followed.

As the criminal charges against Sgt. Jason Bonish, Const. Alex Balloway, the third charged man, and the parties previously accused of criminal negligence move into the judicial system, the court will evaluate the evidence presented by provincial prosecutors. Formal court dates for the accused individuals have yet to be publicly finalized, at which point the details of the allegations will be subjected to legal scrutiny.

In the meantime, law enforcement officials are urging anyone who may possess additional information relevant to the carbon monoxide exposure or the subsequent events to come forward. The Ontario Provincial Police continue to ask members of the public with pertinent details to contact police authorities or submit information anonymously through Crime Stoppers to assist in bringing the ongoing investigation to its conclusion.